From markw at illuminae.com Wed Jun 9 17:48:30 2010 From: markw at illuminae.com (Mark) Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 14:48:30 -0700 Subject: [MOBY-l] down-time for Moby Central Message-ID: Hi all, we need to schedule a couple of hours down-time for MOBY Central to upgrade memory (and hopefully make it faster and more stable!). Is anyone running an analysis or a workshop in the next few days that we should schedule-around? Please let me know ASAP. Thanks! Mark From Marc.Logghe at ablynx.com Mon Jun 14 02:57:34 2010 From: Marc.Logghe at ablynx.com (Marc Logghe) Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 08:57:34 +0200 Subject: [MOBY-l] ocal Central installation Message-ID: <1676D4A332BFF34CA3A07ACDF801FF678F798A90C8@posix.lan.ablynx.com> Hi, A local install of the MOBY-central seems be successful, at least the test scripts are working. However when I import biomoby services in taverna 2.1.2 you get an error "can't update the biomoby cache". In apache access.log you can find the following: 10.0.10.227 - - [11/Jun/2010:16:11:03 +0200] "POST /biomoby/cgi-bin/MOBY-Central.pl HTTP/1.0" 200 1039 "-" "Axis/1.4" 10.0.10.227 - - [11/Jun/2010:16:11:03 +0200] "POST /biomoby/cgi-bin/MOBY-Central.pl HTTP/1.0" 200 1039 "-" "Axis/1.4" 10.0.10.227 - - [11/Jun/2010:16:11:04 +0200] "POST /biomoby/cgi-bin/MOBY-Central.pl HTTP/1.0" 200 291210 "-" "Axis/1.4" 10.0.10.227 - - [11/Jun/2010:16:11:04 +0200] "GET /authority/RESOURCES/MOBY-S/Objects HTTP/1.1" 404 318 "-" "jmoby-central/1.0" 10.0.10.227 - - [11/Jun/2010:16:11:04 +0200] "GET /authority/RESOURCES/MOBY-S/ServiceInstances HTTP/1.1" 404 327 "-" "jmoby-central/1.0" 10.0.10.227 - - [11/Jun/2010:16:45:38 +0200] "GET /authority/RESOURCES/MOBY-S/Objects HTTP/1.1" 404 318 "-" "jmoby-central/1.0" 10.0.10.227 - - [11/Jun/2010:16:45:38 +0200] "POST /biomoby/cgi-bin/MOBY-Central.pl HTTP/1.0" 200 1039 "-" "Axis/1.4" 10.0.10.227 - - [11/Jun/2010:16:45:38 +0200] "POST /biomoby/cgi-bin/MOBY-Central.pl HTTP/1.0" 200 291210 "-" "Axis/1.4" 10.0.10.227 - - [11/Jun/2010:16:45:39 +0200] "GET /authority/RESOURCES/MOBY-S/ServiceInstances HTTP/1.1" 404 327 "-" "jmoby-central/1.0" Also, in error.log one can find "File does not exist: /var/www/html/authority" So, apparently taverna is requesting for some urls that don't exist (/authority/...). I don't know what to do here. The URLs seem to exist at http://moby.ucalgary.ca. Found an authority.pl script in the Perl/MOBY-Server folder but not sure what to do with it. Regards, Marc ------------------------------------------------------------------------ THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE. If the reader of this E-mail message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately at ablynx at ablynx.com. Thank you for your co-operation. "NANOBODY" and "NANOCLONE" are registered trademarks of Ablynx N.V. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From edward.kawas at gmail.com Mon Jun 14 09:15:58 2010 From: edward.kawas at gmail.com (Edward Kawas) Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 06:15:58 -0700 Subject: [MOBY-l] ocal Central installation In-Reply-To: <1676D4A332BFF34CA3A07ACDF801FF678F798A90C8@posix.lan.ablynx.com> References: <1676D4A332BFF34CA3A07ACDF801FF678F798A90C8@posix.lan.ablynx.com> Message-ID: <007501cb0bc3$bb9e19a0$32da4ce0$@gmail.com> Hi Marc, Please refer to the following webpage http://biomoby.open-bio.org/index.php/for-developers/. There is a section called "Installation of Local Registry" that may be of some help for you. Eddie > -----Original Message----- > From: moby-l-bounces at lists.open-bio.org [mailto:moby-l- > bounces at lists.open-bio.org] On Behalf Of Marc Logghe > Sent: Sunday, June 13, 2010 11:58 PM > To: moby-l at lists.open-bio.org > Subject: [MOBY-l] ocal Central installation > > Hi, > A local install of the MOBY-central seems be successful, at least the test > scripts are working. > > However when I import biomoby services in taverna 2.1.2 you get an error > "can't update the biomoby cache". > In apache access.log you can find the following: > 10.0.10.227 - - [11/Jun/2010:16:11:03 +0200] "POST /biomoby/cgi-bin/MOBY- > Central.pl HTTP/1.0" 200 1039 "-" "Axis/1.4" > 10.0.10.227 - - [11/Jun/2010:16:11:03 +0200] "POST /biomoby/cgi-bin/MOBY- > Central.pl HTTP/1.0" 200 1039 "-" "Axis/1.4" > 10.0.10.227 - - [11/Jun/2010:16:11:04 +0200] "POST /biomoby/cgi-bin/MOBY- > Central.pl HTTP/1.0" 200 291210 "-" "Axis/1.4" > 10.0.10.227 - - [11/Jun/2010:16:11:04 +0200] "GET > /authority/RESOURCES/MOBY-S/Objects HTTP/1.1" 404 318 "-" "jmoby- > central/1.0" > 10.0.10.227 - - [11/Jun/2010:16:11:04 +0200] "GET > /authority/RESOURCES/MOBY-S/ServiceInstances HTTP/1.1" 404 327 "-" > "jmoby-central/1.0" > 10.0.10.227 - - [11/Jun/2010:16:45:38 +0200] "GET > /authority/RESOURCES/MOBY-S/Objects HTTP/1.1" 404 318 "-" "jmoby- > central/1.0" > 10.0.10.227 - - [11/Jun/2010:16:45:38 +0200] "POST /biomoby/cgi-bin/MOBY- > Central.pl HTTP/1.0" 200 1039 "-" "Axis/1.4" > 10.0.10.227 - - [11/Jun/2010:16:45:38 +0200] "POST /biomoby/cgi-bin/MOBY- > Central.pl HTTP/1.0" 200 291210 "-" "Axis/1.4" > 10.0.10.227 - - [11/Jun/2010:16:45:39 +0200] "GET > /authority/RESOURCES/MOBY-S/ServiceInstances HTTP/1.1" 404 327 "-" > "jmoby-central/1.0" > > Also, in error.log one can find "File does not exist: /var/www/html/authority" > > So, apparently taverna is requesting for some urls that don't exist > (/authority/...). > I don't know what to do here. > The URLs seem to exist at http://moby.ucalgary.ca. > > Found an authority.pl script in the Perl/MOBY-Server folder but not sure > what to do with it. > > Regards, > Marc > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL > OR ENTITY TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION > THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE. > If the reader of this E-mail message is not the intended recipient, you are > hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this > communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication > in error, please notify us immediately at ablynx at ablynx.com. Thank you for > your co-operation. > "NANOBODY" and "NANOCLONE" are registered trademarks of Ablynx N.V. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > moby-l mailing list > moby-l at lists.open-bio.org > http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/moby-l From Marc.Logghe at ablynx.com Tue Jun 15 03:45:59 2010 From: Marc.Logghe at ablynx.com (Marc Logghe) Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:45:59 +0200 Subject: [MOBY-l] ocal Central installation In-Reply-To: <007501cb0bc3$bb9e19a0$32da4ce0$@gmail.com> References: <1676D4A332BFF34CA3A07ACDF801FF678F798A90C8@posix.lan.ablynx.com> <007501cb0bc3$bb9e19a0$32da4ce0$@gmail.com> Message-ID: <1676D4A332BFF34CA3A07ACDF801FF678F8D86A8BF@posix.lan.ablynx.com> Hi Eddie, Thanks for the link. For whatever reason I ended up following the documentation here: http://biomoby.open-bio.org/CVS_CONTENT/moby-live/Docs/MOBY-S_API/InstallingLocalMOBYCentral.html But there I did not find info on authorities and resources. Need to do some more apache configuration but I'm getting closer. Thanks again. Marc Marc Logghe Senior Bioinformatician Ablynx nv > -----Original Message----- > From: Edward Kawas [mailto:edward.kawas at gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 3:16 PM > To: Marc Logghe; moby-l at lists.open-bio.org > Subject: RE: [MOBY-l] ocal Central installation > > Hi Marc, > > Please refer to the following webpage > http://biomoby.open-bio.org/index.php/for-developers/. There is a > section > called "Installation of Local Registry" that may be of some help for > you. > > Eddie > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: moby-l-bounces at lists.open-bio.org [mailto:moby-l- > > bounces at lists.open-bio.org] On Behalf Of Marc Logghe > > Sent: Sunday, June 13, 2010 11:58 PM > > To: moby-l at lists.open-bio.org > > Subject: [MOBY-l] ocal Central installation > > > > Hi, > > A local install of the MOBY-central seems be successful, at least the > test > > scripts are working. > > > > However when I import biomoby services in taverna 2.1.2 you get an > error > > "can't update the biomoby cache". > > In apache access.log you can find the following: > > 10.0.10.227 - - [11/Jun/2010:16:11:03 +0200] "POST /biomoby/cgi- > bin/MOBY- > > Central.pl HTTP/1.0" 200 1039 "-" "Axis/1.4" > > 10.0.10.227 - - [11/Jun/2010:16:11:03 +0200] "POST /biomoby/cgi- > bin/MOBY- > > Central.pl HTTP/1.0" 200 1039 "-" "Axis/1.4" > > 10.0.10.227 - - [11/Jun/2010:16:11:04 +0200] "POST /biomoby/cgi- > bin/MOBY- > > Central.pl HTTP/1.0" 200 291210 "-" "Axis/1.4" > > 10.0.10.227 - - [11/Jun/2010:16:11:04 +0200] "GET > > /authority/RESOURCES/MOBY-S/Objects HTTP/1.1" 404 318 "-" "jmoby- > > central/1.0" > > 10.0.10.227 - - [11/Jun/2010:16:11:04 +0200] "GET > > /authority/RESOURCES/MOBY-S/ServiceInstances HTTP/1.1" 404 327 "-" > > "jmoby-central/1.0" > > 10.0.10.227 - - [11/Jun/2010:16:45:38 +0200] "GET > > /authority/RESOURCES/MOBY-S/Objects HTTP/1.1" 404 318 "-" "jmoby- > > central/1.0" > > 10.0.10.227 - - [11/Jun/2010:16:45:38 +0200] "POST /biomoby/cgi- > bin/MOBY- > > Central.pl HTTP/1.0" 200 1039 "-" "Axis/1.4" > > 10.0.10.227 - - [11/Jun/2010:16:45:38 +0200] "POST /biomoby/cgi- > bin/MOBY- > > Central.pl HTTP/1.0" 200 291210 "-" "Axis/1.4" > > 10.0.10.227 - - [11/Jun/2010:16:45:39 +0200] "GET > > /authority/RESOURCES/MOBY-S/ServiceInstances HTTP/1.1" 404 327 "-" > > "jmoby-central/1.0" > > > > Also, in error.log one can find "File does not exist: > /var/www/html/authority" > > > > So, apparently taverna is requesting for some urls that don't exist > > (/authority/...). > > I don't know what to do here. > > The URLs seem to exist at http://moby.ucalgary.ca. > > > > Found an authority.pl script in the Perl/MOBY-Server folder but not > sure > > what to do with it. > > > > Regards, > > Marc > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > > THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL > > OR ENTITY TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION > > THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE. > > If the reader of this E-mail message is not the intended recipient, > you > are > > hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of > this > > communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > communication > > in error, please notify us immediately at ablynx at ablynx.com. Thank > you for > > your co-operation. > > "NANOBODY" and "NANOCLONE" are registered trademarks of Ablynx N.V. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > > > > _______________________________________________ > > moby-l mailing list > > moby-l at lists.open-bio.org > > http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/moby-l From markw at illuminae.com Wed Jun 16 17:09:28 2010 From: markw at illuminae.com (Mark Wilkinson) Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:09:28 -0700 Subject: [MOBY-l] Moby Central RAM upgrade Message-ID: MOBY Central has now had its RAM upgrade. It should be a lot faster and hopefully more stable now. Please let me know if you notice any problems (or any improvement!) Best wishes all! Mark From markw at illuminae.com Mon Jun 28 14:36:21 2010 From: markw at illuminae.com (Mark) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:36:21 -0700 Subject: [MOBY-l] What to do with the BioMoby website Message-ID: Hi all, As you know, we switched the BioMoby website to Wordpress several years ago. We've just noticed that the WP installation has been compromised, and unfortunately the update to a more secure version of Wordpress is not a trivial process! So... I'm now wondering what we should do with the website. I must admit that I rarely use it - I do look at the interactive map from time-to-time, and the list of papers and software is often useful to refer to... but the bloggy-aspect of the site is something that I simply never use (and it hasn't been updated in quite a while!) From my perspective, the Moby project is "finished", and I have personally moved-on to the newer SADI interoperability framework project (and I hope many Moby'ers will maked this move also!!) so other than archival I have no personal interest in maintaining the current biomoby website, but maybe others do? Does anyone have an interest in any of the biomoby.org website content? If so, please let me know which "bits" are useful/interesting to you and I will create an archive of those pieces on a simple, straightforward set of web pages. Those bits that nobody has an interest in will simply be taken down, I think. We don't have time/manpower at the moment to do a Wordpress upgrade, and having a compromised site on open-bio is not something we can ignore! The biomoby domain, however, is still required as we have a ton of proxying happening via that domain name, so the domain will remain up and running. All we really need to do is take WordPress down, while keeping any useful bits of the Wordpress site available in some simple page-form. Let me know what you all think. Best wishes! Mark P.S. If anyone is interested, we ran the stats the other day - the Moby Central registry hosted in Canada was hit >800,000 times in the past year, and the BioMoby services that we host here were hit almost 1.4 Million times in the past 12 months!! ...so... the project is still pretty active for sure!! From dag at sonsorol.org Mon Jun 28 14:57:46 2010 From: dag at sonsorol.org (Chris Dagdigian) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:57:46 -0400 Subject: [MOBY-l] What to do with the BioMoby website In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4C28F0AA.1020706@sonsorol.org> Actually quick update from the sysadmin side here. We were able to regain admin access and it was actually not all that hard to migrate the blog from version 1.5.2 all the way up to wordpress 3.0 Currently we are re-processing 70,000 comments through the akismet spam tester. It's likely that 100% of those comments were spam but since I don't have time to manually review them we decided to pipe them through the spam filter again and see what stays. Anyway since the wordpress 3.0 upgrade went smoothly I think the "what to do" discussion has less urgency. If it would have been a beast to clean up the website then we'd proabably want to talk about relocating it to a less harmful sandbox but that no longer may be necessary. It will take me the rest of the week to see if our box is still compromised and we eventually need to wipe and update the entire system since it's running an ancient version of CentOS but overall I'm feeling OK with leaving the newly updated site as-is -Chris Mark wrote: > Hi all, > > As you know, we switched the BioMoby website to Wordpress several years > ago. We've just noticed that the WP installation has been compromised, > and unfortunately the update to a more secure version of Wordpress is > not a trivial process! > > So... I'm now wondering what we should do with the website. I must admit > that I rarely use it - I do look at the interactive map from > time-to-time, and the list of papers and software is often useful to > refer to... but the bloggy-aspect of the site is something that I simply > never use (and it hasn't been updated in quite a while!) > > From my perspective, the Moby project is "finished", and I have > personally moved-on to the newer SADI interoperability framework project > (and I hope many Moby'ers will maked this move also!!) so other than > archival I have no personal interest in maintaining the current biomoby > website, but maybe others do? > Does anyone have an interest in any of the biomoby.org website content? > If so, please let me know which "bits" are useful/interesting to you and > I will create an archive of those pieces on a simple, straightforward > set of web pages. Those bits that nobody has an interest in will simply > be taken down, I think. We don't have time/manpower at the moment to do > a Wordpress upgrade, and having a compromised site on open-bio is not > something we can ignore! > > The biomoby domain, however, is still required as we have a ton of > proxying happening via that domain name, so the domain will remain up > and running. All we really need to do is take WordPress down, while > keeping any useful bits of the Wordpress site available in some simple > page-form. > > Let me know what you all think. > > Best wishes! > > Mark > > P.S. If anyone is interested, we ran the stats the other day - the Moby > Central registry hosted in Canada was hit >800,000 times in the past > year, and the BioMoby services that we host here were hit almost 1.4 > Million times in the past 12 months!! ...so... the project is still > pretty active for sure!! > _______________________________________________ > moby-l mailing list > moby-l at lists.open-bio.org > http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/moby-l From markw at illuminae.com Mon Jun 28 15:30:35 2010 From: markw at illuminae.com (Mark) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 12:30:35 -0700 Subject: [MOBY-l] [MOBY-dev] What to do with the BioMoby website In-Reply-To: <4C28F0AA.1020706@sonsorol.org> References: <4C28F0AA.1020706@sonsorol.org> Message-ID: Oh! Okay then... crisis resolved :-) Chris, you ROCK!! Thank you for all your time and effort!! Mark On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:57:46 -0700, Chris Dagdigian wrote: > > Actually quick update from the sysadmin side here. > > We were able to regain admin access and it was actually not all that > hard to migrate the blog from version 1.5.2 all the way up to wordpress > 3.0 > > Currently we are re-processing 70,000 comments through the akismet spam > tester. It's likely that 100% of those comments were spam but since I > don't have time to manually review them we decided to pipe them through > the spam filter again and see what stays. > > Anyway since the wordpress 3.0 upgrade went smoothly I think the "what > to do" discussion has less urgency. If it would have been a beast to > clean up the website then we'd proabably want to talk about relocating > it to a less harmful sandbox but that no longer may be necessary. > > It will take me the rest of the week to see if our box is still > compromised and we eventually need to wipe and update the entire system > since it's running an ancient version of CentOS but overall I'm feeling > OK with leaving the newly updated site as-is > > -Chris > > > > > > Mark wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> As you know, we switched the BioMoby website to Wordpress several years >> ago. We've just noticed that the WP installation has been compromised, >> and unfortunately the update to a more secure version of Wordpress is >> not a trivial process! >> >> So... I'm now wondering what we should do with the website. I must admit >> that I rarely use it - I do look at the interactive map from >> time-to-time, and the list of papers and software is often useful to >> refer to... but the bloggy-aspect of the site is something that I simply >> never use (and it hasn't been updated in quite a while!) >> >> From my perspective, the Moby project is "finished", and I have >> personally moved-on to the newer SADI interoperability framework project >> (and I hope many Moby'ers will maked this move also!!) so other than >> archival I have no personal interest in maintaining the current biomoby >> website, but maybe others do? >> Does anyone have an interest in any of the biomoby.org website content? >> If so, please let me know which "bits" are useful/interesting to you and >> I will create an archive of those pieces on a simple, straightforward >> set of web pages. Those bits that nobody has an interest in will simply >> be taken down, I think. We don't have time/manpower at the moment to do >> a Wordpress upgrade, and having a compromised site on open-bio is not >> something we can ignore! >> >> The biomoby domain, however, is still required as we have a ton of >> proxying happening via that domain name, so the domain will remain up >> and running. All we really need to do is take WordPress down, while >> keeping any useful bits of the Wordpress site available in some simple >> page-form. >> >> Let me know what you all think. >> >> Best wishes! >> >> Mark >> >> P.S. If anyone is interested, we ran the stats the other day - the Moby >> Central registry hosted in Canada was hit >800,000 times in the past >> year, and the BioMoby services that we host here were hit almost 1.4 >> Million times in the past 12 months!! ...so... the project is still >> pretty active for sure!! >> _______________________________________________ >> moby-l mailing list >> moby-l at lists.open-bio.org >> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/moby-l > _______________________________________________ > MOBY-dev mailing list > MOBY-dev at lists.open-bio.org > http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/moby-dev From markw at illuminae.com Mon Jun 28 15:31:57 2010 From: markw at illuminae.com (Mark) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 12:31:57 -0700 Subject: [MOBY-l] [MOBY-dev] What to do with the BioMoby website In-Reply-To: <4C28F0AA.1020706@sonsorol.org> References: <4C28F0AA.1020706@sonsorol.org> Message-ID: by the way... Eddie just corrected me. The number of hits on MOBY Central registry (800,000) and the number of hits on the Canadian services (1.4M) were in the past TWO months, not the past 12 months. Wow!! The project really IS still going strong! Mark From schoof at mpiz-koeln.mpg.de Tue Jun 29 04:10:33 2010 From: schoof at mpiz-koeln.mpg.de (Heiko Schoof) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 10:10:33 +0200 Subject: [MOBY-l] [MOBY-dev] What to do with the BioMoby website In-Reply-To: References: <4C28F0AA.1020706@sonsorol.org> Message-ID: <6322376D-3D6A-4905-B89E-133475D03122@mpiz-koeln.mpg.de> Dear Chris, thanks a mill for rescue work! Dear Mark, for us Biomoby is still a core necessity in projects running at least until mid of next year. If anything needs taken care of, let me know; we have just taken your continued Biomoby support for granted but in no way does that mean we'll let Biomoby die silently. You don't even see all our biomoby usage as our EUSOL internal services run off our own registry. Best, Heiko On 28.06.2010, at 21:31, Mark wrote: > by the way... Eddie just corrected me. > > The number of hits on MOBY Central registry (800,000) and the number > of hits on the Canadian services (1.4M) were in the past TWO months, > not the past 12 months. > > Wow!! The project really IS still going strong! > > Mark > _______________________________________________ > moby-l mailing list > moby-l at lists.open-bio.org > http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/moby-l From markw at illuminae.com Tue Jun 29 10:32:36 2010 From: markw at illuminae.com (Mark) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 07:32:36 -0700 Subject: [MOBY-l] [MOBY-dev] What to do with the BioMoby website In-Reply-To: <6322376D-3D6A-4905-B89E-133475D03122@mpiz-koeln.mpg.de> References: <4C28F0AA.1020706@sonsorol.org> <6322376D-3D6A-4905-B89E-133475D03122@mpiz-koeln.mpg.de> Message-ID: Hi Heiko, No panic :-) We are not "abandoning" BioMoby any time in the foreseeable future! Certainly the majority of my resources are going into the SADI project rather than the Moby project, but Moby doesn't cost a lot to maintain so there is no pressure at all to shut it down. It was simply a matter of an urgent situation arising with the project website without any hands to look after it properly and quickly, so we were exploring drastic measures. (thanks again, Chris!!!) It would certainly be interesting to know the activity of the project worldwide. Your registry, the INB registry, the IRRI registry, plus our copy of Moby Central... must be close to 1M registry queries per month, I suspect! (do any of you have these statistics?) Not bad for a project that had it's initial funding cut by 70% because the reviewer said "it'll never work" :-) Mark On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 01:10:33 -0700, Heiko Schoof wrote: > Dear Chris, thanks a mill for rescue work! > > Dear Mark, for us Biomoby is still a core necessity in projects > running at least until mid of next year. If anything needs taken care > of, let me know; we have just taken your continued Biomoby support for > granted but in no way does that mean we'll let Biomoby die silently. > > You don't even see all our biomoby usage as our EUSOL internal > services run off our own registry. > > Best, Heiko > > On 28.06.2010, at 21:31, Mark wrote: > >> by the way... Eddie just corrected me. >> >> The number of hits on MOBY Central registry (800,000) and the number >> of hits on the Canadian services (1.4M) were in the past TWO months, >> not the past 12 months. >> >> Wow!! The project really IS still going strong! >> >> Mark >> _______________________________________________ >> moby-l mailing list >> moby-l at lists.open-bio.org >> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/moby-l > > _______________________________________________ > moby-l mailing list > moby-l at lists.open-bio.org > http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/moby-l